托福閱讀真題Official 51 Passage 1（六）

托福閱讀真題Official 51 Passage 1（六）

Memphis:United Egypt’s First Capital

The city of Memphis,located on the Nile near the modern city of Cairo,was founded around 3100 B.C.as the first capital of a recently united Egypt.The choice of Memphis by Egypt’s first kings reflects the site’s strategic importance.First,and most obvious,the apex of the Nile River delta was a politically opportune location for the state’s administrative center,standing between the united lands of Upper and Lower Egypt and offering ready access to both parts of the country.The older predynastic(pre-3100 B.C.)centers of power,This and Hierakonpolis,were too remote from the vast expanse of the delta,which had been incorporated into the unified state.Only a city within easy reach of both the Nile valley to the south and the more spread out,difficult terrain to the north could provide the necessary political control that the rulers of early dynastic Egypt(roughly 3000–2600 B.C.)required.

The region of Memphis must have also served as an important node for transport and communications,even before the unification of Egypt.The region probably acted as a conduit for much,if not all,of the river-based trade between northern and southern Egypt.Moreover,commodities(such as wine,precious oils,and metals)imported from the Near East by the royal courts of predynastic Upper Egypt would have been channeled through the Memphis region on their way south.In short,therefore,the site of Memphis offered the rulers of the Early Dynastic Period an ideal location for controlling internal trade within their realm,an essential requirement for a state-directed economy that depended on the movement of goods.

Equally important for the national administration was the ability to control communications within Egypt.The Nile provided the easiest and quickest artery of communication,and the national capital was,again,ideally located in this respect.Recent geological surveys of the Memphis region have revealed much about its topography in ancient times.It appears that the location of Memphis may have been even more advantageous for controlling trade,transport,and communications than was previously appreciated.Surveys and drill cores have shown that the level of the Nile floodplain has steadily risen over the last five millenniums.When the floodplain was much lower,as it would have been in predynastic and early dynastic times,the outwash fans(fan-shaped deposits of sediments)of various wadis(stream-beds or channels that carry water only during rainy periods)would have been much more prominent features on the east bank.The fan associated with the Wadi Hof extended a significant way into the Nile floodplain,forming a constriction in the vicinity of Memphis.The valley may have narrowed at this point to a mere three kilometers,making it the ideal place for controlling river traffic.

Furthermore,the Memphis region seems to have been favorably located for the control not only of river-based trade but also of desert trade routes.The two outwash fans in the area gave access to the extensive wadi systems of the eastern desert.In predynastic times,the Wadi Digla may have served as a trade route between the Memphis region and the Near East,to judge from the unusual concentration of foreign artifacts found in the predynastic settlement of Maadi.Access to,and control of,trade routes between Egypt and the Near East seems to have been a preoccupation of Egypt’s rulers during the period of state formation.The desire to monopolize foreign trade may have been one of the primary factors behind the political unification of Egypt.The foundation of the national capital at the junction of an important trade route with the Nile valley is not likely to have been accidental.Moreover,the Wadis Hof and Digla provided the Memphis region with accessible desert pasturage.As was the case with the cities of Hierakonpolis and Elkab,the combination within the same area of both desert pasturage and alluvial arable land(land suitable for growing crops)was a particularly attractive one for early settlement;this combination no doubt contributed to the prosperity of the Memphis region from early predynastic times.

Question 11 of 14

The phrase“to have been accidental”in the passage is closest in meaning to

A.to have gone wrong

B.to have been helpful

C.to have occurred by chance

D.to have made a difference

正確答案：C

題目詳解

題型分類：詞匯題

選項(xiàng)分析：

to have been accidental：偶然的。定位句前面和后面都在講選擇孟菲斯作為首都的原因，所以可知...is not likely to have been accidental不是偶然的意思，即accidental：偶然的，與C選項(xiàng)，偶爾發(fā)生，意思一致。

A選項(xiàng)，錯(cuò)誤的。

B選項(xiàng)，有幫助的。

D選項(xiàng)，與眾不同。

三者帶入均不符合語(yǔ)境。

Question 12 of 14

In paragraph 4,why does the author mention the cities of Hierakonpolis and Elkab?

A.To give an indication of the level of prosperity that Memphis is thought to have enjoyed from its earliest days

B.To compare the Memphis region to them in terms of their similar combinations of characteristics providing advantages for early settlement

C.To identify the models that the founders of Memphis followed in laying out the national capital

D.To suggest that the combination of desert pasturage and alluvial arable land in the same area was very common

正確答案：B

題目詳解

題型分類：修辭目的題

題干分析：考察句子之間的關(guān)系。

選項(xiàng)分析：

定位句前面講選擇孟菲斯作為首都的原因是孟菲斯距離牧場(chǎng)比較近，定位句講Hierakonpolis and Elkab也有牧場(chǎng)因此吸引了人們定居，定位句中as was the case是類比的標(biāo)志，所以講解Hierakonpolis and Elkab是為更好的理解孟菲斯的好處，即也是有牧場(chǎng)然后吸引人們定居，與B選項(xiàng)一致。

A選項(xiàng)，level of prosperity沒提及。

C選項(xiàng)，models表述錯(cuò)誤，文中只是說(shuō)孟菲斯和這兩個(gè)城市相近，看不出孟菲斯模仿了它們。

D選項(xiàng)，文中只是講兩個(gè)城市，看不出very common。

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fèi)測(cè)試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)不再困難<<