雅思大作文范文：送孩子上學(xué)是政府的責(zé)任還是父母的責(zé)任

中國教育在線小編為大家收集整理了雅思大作文范文：送孩子上學(xué)是政府的責(zé)任還是父母的責(zé)任。那么接下來就跟著中國教育在線小編一起來看看，相信你通過以下的文章內(nèi)容就會(huì)有更深入的了解。

雅思大作文范文：送孩子上學(xué)是政府的責(zé)任還是父母的責(zé)任

雅思大作文題目：

Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school.Others think it is the government’s responsibility to do so.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

【話題分類】

教育和交通運(yùn)輸類

【題目解析】

題目大意：有的人認(rèn)為家長需要送孩子上學(xué)，其他人則認(rèn)為應(yīng)該由政府安排。

題型特點(diǎn)：討論雙方觀點(diǎn)并給出自己的看法。

本文結(jié)構(gòu)：除去總起段和總結(jié)段提出爭議和表明立場(chǎng)，主體段部分先展開分析自己不認(rèn)同的觀點(diǎn)，再陳述自己認(rèn)同的觀點(diǎn)理由。

【難點(diǎn)】

本題話題看似簡單，與學(xué)生的日常生活密切相關(guān)。但是需要注意題目中的核心概念是“家長自行安排上學(xué)方式”，并不局限于“家長自行接送”，注意在思路上避免偏頗。另外，題目要求對(duì)雙方觀點(diǎn)都有展開討論，也有提供作者自己的看法，需要小心檢查內(nèi)容是否完整。

【寫作思路】

開頭段：在世界各地，父母為孩子安排上下學(xué)交通是很常見的做法，無論是依靠自己開車、坐朋友便車，還是使用公共交通線路。然而，一些教育學(xué)家認(rèn)為，協(xié)調(diào)安排應(yīng)該是政府的責(zé)任，據(jù)說在效率和教育價(jià)值方面更有優(yōu)勢(shì)。這種說法有道理嗎？

主體段1：有些人聲稱，傳統(tǒng)上送孩子上學(xué)和放學(xué)是由家庭成員的責(zé)任，是養(yǎng)育孩子的一部分，我可以理解他們的觀點(diǎn)。最常見的理由是，交通和食宿一樣，構(gòu)成了兒童日常必需的一部分，通常由他們的家庭安排。然而，這忽略了一個(gè)事實(shí)，即隨著工作時(shí)間的增加和由此提高的生產(chǎn)力，普通員工很難從繁忙的日程中留出兩個(gè)小時(shí)接送孩子或付錢委托他人接送，期望他們自己安排可能不再合理。另一個(gè)因素是人們覺得自己接送能適應(yīng)個(gè)別家庭的具體需要，更加靈活。在某些特殊情況下，確實(shí)可能如此，因此有價(jià)值；但對(duì)于大多數(shù)不需要額外關(guān)注或設(shè)施的學(xué)生來說，與參加當(dāng)局安排的交通計(jì)劃所節(jié)省的時(shí)間和金錢相比，其好處微不足道。

主體段2：另一方面，其他人則認(rèn)為政府主導(dǎo)的交通計(jì)劃是更有效的選擇。贊成這種集中式方法的最普遍的理由是效率更高。另一個(gè)好處是，學(xué)生們與各種同齡人相處時(shí)形成獨(dú)特的學(xué)習(xí)機(jī)會(huì)。

結(jié)尾段：總的來說，讓許多家長接送學(xué)齡兒童上學(xué)既不合理也不現(xiàn)實(shí)，而政府資助和監(jiān)管的出行方式可能是一個(gè)更好的選擇。如果得到有效實(shí)施和協(xié)調(diào)，這項(xiàng)政策有可能為工作繁忙的父母減輕負(fù)擔(dān)，為教育和交通部門降低成本，并為學(xué)生提供有安全有趣的教育經(jīng)歷。

【參考范文】

It is common practice in many parts of the world for parents to arrange home-to-school transportation for their children,whether reliant on driving their own cars,lifts from friends,or public transport routes.Some educationalists,however,argue that it should be the government's responsibility to make coordinated arrangements,which are said to be superior in terms of efficiency and educational values.Is this claim justified?

Some people claim that sending children to and from school,a responsibility traditionally borne by family members,is part of parenting and I can understand their point of view.The most common reason cited is that transport,like food and accommodation,constitutes part of children’s daily necessities,normally organized by their family.This,however,ignores that fact that with the increased number of workhours and the resulting productivity,it might no longer be reasonable to expect the average employee to set aside two hours from their busy schedule for this purpose or cover the expenses for delegating others to do so.Another factor is the perceived flexibility to suit specific needs of individual households.This might be true and hence valuable under some special circumstances,but the benefits for most students,who do not require extra attention or facilities,are minor compared with the time and money saved by joining a commute scheme organized by the authorities.

Others,on the other hand,consider government-led transport programmes to be a more effective alternative.The most popular reason in favour of this centralized approach is increased efficiency.This means coordinated route planning,fewer vehicles on the road and trained personnel to oversee the journey and ensure a safe travelling experience,all of which would not be possible if individual households make their own arrangements.Another benefit is the unique learning opportunity for the schoolers when mixed with a variety of peers.They likely develop a sense of responsibility by performing such routine tasks as checking their seatbelts and looking after their personal belongings,while daily interactions with their bus mates,often from different classes and ages,can raise awareness of cultural diversity and teach them to help others.

Overall,while it is neither reasonable nor practical for many parents to transport their school-aged children to school,government-funded and regulated home-to-school travel is probably a better alternative.If implemented and coordinated effectively,this policy can potentially reduce the burden on busy working parents,cut costs for the educational and transport authorities and ensure a safe and fun schooling experience for students.

以上就是“雅思大作文范文：送孩子上學(xué)是政府的責(zé)任還是父母的責(zé)任”的詳細(xì)介紹，如果還有其他相關(guān)問題需要了解，歡迎各位小伙伴熱情咨詢?cè)蹅冎袊逃诰€的老師，預(yù)祝各位同學(xué)早日取得好成績

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fèi)測(cè)試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語學(xué)習(xí)不再困難<<