教育類雅思寫作范文之課程設(shè)置,為幫助大家更好準備雅思考試,現(xiàn)在陸續(xù)為大家提供雅思作文考試新真題和范文及其譯文,希望對大家雅思考試有所幫助,一起來看:教育類雅思寫作范文之課程設(shè)置?! 究碱}解析】 考題重現(xiàn):The authorities such as the government decide the subjects and lessoncontents. Some people argue that teachers should make the choice. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 核心詞匯:government decides the subjects, teachers decide the subjects 文章結(jié)構(gòu):辯論型片面式話題?! ?分范文】
A heated debate has begun on whether the government or the professor has more right todetermine students' subjects. Some may doubt the local government's authority in blueprintingthe outline for university subjects. However, in my opinion, governments offer more assistance tomake the correct resolution than teachers do.
Although teachers arc the closest people who update their teaching methods according tostudents' personalities, their problem is that they lack a full-scale view when making decisions onnew subjects. In addition, subjects are related to teaching books, and teaching books are relatedto selling profits, which may mislead the process of subjects innovation.
When it comes to the benefit of governmental decisions, three things should be mentioned:Firstly, compared with a teacher or a school, the authorities have more money, which is a mustfor this public affair. In other words, the more funds invested in this area, the better the outcomewill be. Secondly, no matter who is in charge of this project, individuals arc the key elementsin the first place. Obviously, it is more efficient for the government to assemble more talent atone time who can contribute advice regarding subject innovation and planning. Lastly, withoutpursuing benefits, the government is impartial, and thus it will have a full-scale awareness of thesystematic arrangement of college education.
ln conclusion, governments arc more appropriate to make a blueprint and provide a platformfor college education, on which teachers play vital roles in teaching and cultivating.
【范文譯文】 目前一個熱議話題是,政府和教師。究竟誰有更多的權(quán)利來決定學生的在校課程。有些人可能質(zhì)疑當?shù)卣贫ǖ拇髮W課程規(guī)劃藍圖。而我認為,比起老師,政府擁有更多支持。更能做出正確決斷?! ”M管教師接近學生,他們會根據(jù)學生的特點更新其教學方法。但問題是。他們制定課程時,會缺少全局觀念。此外,課程會涉及到教材,教材就涉及銷售利潤,這一切都會誤導課程創(chuàng)新的過程?! 《贫ㄕn程。有三方面的好處:第一,與一名教師或一所學校相比,政府擁有更多的資金。這對于處理公眾事件是必要條件。也就是說,投入在此的資金越多,效果就越好。第二,無論誰主管課程改革。人才首先都是關(guān)鍵的要素。顯然,政府能更有效地一次性地組織更多人才,他們在課程創(chuàng)新和規(guī)劃上會提供建議。后,不追求利益,政府做事相對不失偏頗。因此會有全局觀念,從而為大學制定系統(tǒng)性的課程?! 】傊?,政府更適合制定藍圖和搭建大學教育的平臺。在此基礎(chǔ)上,教師可起到教學和培養(yǎng)人才的作用?! 玖咙c句型】