大陸雅思大作文7分范文：破壞公物的懲罰辦法

留學(xué)，語(yǔ)言成績(jī)是必要材料之一，并且在申請(qǐng)?jiān)盒５倪M(jìn)程中，語(yǔ)言成績(jī)的高低直接影響著你最終能申請(qǐng)什么到水平的院校，下面外語(yǔ)頻道小編為大家具體分享下“10月14日大陸雅思大作文7分范文：破壞公物的懲罰辦法”內(nèi)容。

高分范文示例

Some people assume that the offenders of vandalism should be sentenced to community services rather than other punishments; however, I would say it is this conviction is erroneous while ignoring contexts.

Those championing the community sentences opt to venerate this penalty as a panacea to all individuals defacing public assets. From their perspective, compulsory unpaid work for local communities is most effective in rehabilitating the offenders: the services not only change their misbehaviors, but also give them an opportunity to learn to be a contributive member of society. In contrast, a fine penalty or imprisonment is considered to nothing more than a pure deterrent.

While the advantages for a social order for vandalism does seem plausible, it is generalized to assume it necessarily better than other options. Which type of penalty deserve more justification should not be judged in the abstract, but in relation to various factors in the real context, whether these be the material value of the damage or the potential repercussions on the populace. For example, if the costs of the destructed property were enormous, pure community services coupled with a fine would be more suitable option. By the same token, in case the crime posed threat to public safety, the criminals would deserve more serious punishment such as imprisonment.

From what has been discussed, it is my conclusion therefore, it is simplistic to venerate community sentences over other option in addressing vandalism, while the most effective punishing option should be discussed in contexts.

相關(guān)詞匯和語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)

vandalism 破壞公物

deface 損壞外觀

panacea 靈丹妙藥

rehabilitate 使（囚犯）獲得改造

關(guān)于10月14日大陸雅思大作文7分范文：破壞公物的懲罰辦法這個(gè)問(wèn)題本文的分享就到這里結(jié)束了，如果您還想了解更多相關(guān)的內(nèi)容，那么可以持續(xù)關(guān)注本頻道。

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fèi)測(cè)試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)不再困難<<