（陸哲說(shuō)）雅思寫作警察帶槍執(zhí)法是否會(huì)導(dǎo)致更高水平的暴力

【陸哲說(shuō)】雅思寫作：警察帶槍執(zhí)法是否會(huì)導(dǎo)致更高水平的暴力，很多同學(xué)對(duì)于這個(gè)問(wèn)題有疑問(wèn)和不解，那么下面就跟著中國(guó)教育在線的小編詳細(xì)了解一下吧。

其實(shí)這道題不是新題，在以往題庫(kù)中的確出現(xiàn)過(guò)幾次。但是著實(shí)不常見(jiàn)。再加上這個(gè)話題類別距離我們生活比較遙遠(yuǎn)，所以對(duì)于考生而言，這道題的確難度異常。所以，一時(shí)技癢，寫了個(gè)例文供大家參考。

題目如下：

Some people believe that police carrying guns will encourage higher levelof violence in the whole society. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 20210320

警察帶槍執(zhí)法會(huì)導(dǎo)致更高水平的暴力。本題其實(shí)并不復(fù)雜，無(wú)奈很多考生心思繁亂，反而越構(gòu)思越凌亂，最后竟無(wú)從下筆了。

本題大家根本沒(méi)必要去討論這個(gè)地區(qū)的槍支管制問(wèn)題，其實(shí)一概而論才好討論。如果大家簡(jiǎn)單地把不同國(guó)家分成控槍和擁槍兩類，反而沒(méi)有邏輯也沒(méi)有必要。

Whether police officers should take guns with them has aroused a worldwide controversy, and many objectors stress that guns of law enforcers can unquestionably create a large number of violent crimes that are even more serious. Personally, I am confirmedly on their side.

開頭段簡(jiǎn)單介紹背景，隨后點(diǎn)題。并且直接表明了筆者立場(chǎng)。帶槍執(zhí)法就是會(huì)導(dǎo)致更多更嚴(yán)重的暴力犯罪。

Primarily,while law-executors are equipped with guns, universally known as lethal weapons, lawbreakers are correspondingly going to be armed with guns too, whether it be in the country with or without strict control of guns. For gaining an advantage over police in a gunfight,some offenders even take military weapons with them while committing crimes. That can explain why in some cases a simple theft can deteriorate into a gunfire, which finally is regarded as a felony in most regions of the world. This is like the game theory: the weapon race happens between policemen and criminals.

主一段的觀點(diǎn)很簡(jiǎn)單，其實(shí)這就是博弈論。警察配槍執(zhí)法，那么犯罪分子同樣也會(huì)武裝自己。在控槍嚴(yán)格的國(guó)家，犯罪分子還是能搞到殺傷性武器，在控槍不嚴(yán)格的國(guó)家他們甚至?xí)杰娪梦淦鳌?/p>

在1997年，美國(guó)好萊塢發(fā)生一起銀行劫案，兩位劫匪手持AK，對(duì)最先到場(chǎng)的警員各種掃射。而警員手里只有手槍，火力完全不在一個(gè)水平線上。此外，由于犯罪分子不斷武裝自己，有一些原本簡(jiǎn)單的盜竊犯罪，也可能升級(jí)成為槍戰(zhàn)。

這里補(bǔ)充一下，1997年的劫案在一定程度上修改了美國(guó)警察的配槍條例。其實(shí)兩位劫匪都手持重武器，說(shuō)是AK，但網(wǎng)上也有另一種說(shuō)法。大家可以自行網(wǎng)搜。去銀行搶劫，都是為了現(xiàn)金。拿那么多重武器，就直接導(dǎo)致不能攜帶更多的現(xiàn)金。所以，劫匪在選擇武器裝備的時(shí)候也是兩難。拿手槍可能打不過(guò)警察，拿重武器，那錢怎么搬運(yùn)？

簡(jiǎn)而言之，大家覺(jué)得警察的配槍是震懾犯罪分子，其實(shí)犯罪分子早就計(jì)劃好了，想用重武器震懾一切。

More significantly, policemen are usually thought to be responsible,reliable and justicial gun-owners. Nevertheless, in some countries there are thousands of cases reported a year in media on the misuse of guns of law enforcers. Without any doubt, in all countries there are rigorous rules on when, how and where police can use guns,whereas in some emergent situations they might use guns unnecessarily due to their undue mental tension or the wrong judgement of howcriminal suspects are going to behave. Using guns in this moment canto a great extent help them avoid the risk, although sometimes they are not able to clearly understand what will happen. Therefore,tragedies occur, and the level of violence ascends.

警察持槍，誰(shuí)又能保證警察不會(huì)濫用槍支呢？他們對(duì)槍支的濫用，這也是暴力犯罪啊。但凡關(guān)注點(diǎn)社會(huì)新聞的小伙伴們，肯定知道弗洛伊德2700萬(wàn)美元這兩個(gè)詞是什么意思吧。在執(zhí)法過(guò)程中，很多時(shí)候都是千鈞一發(fā)之際，警員很難做出所謂的最正確決定。稍有差池，后果不堪設(shè)想。過(guò)度執(zhí)法就是暴力犯罪。

In summary, guns in the hand of criminals cause violence undoubtedly,and in terms of police the situation is the same. Therefore, the widespread use of non-lethal police weapons is what can solve this problem substantially, with which police can deter outlaws fromviolating laws without leading to more violent crimes.

說(shuō)到這里大家肯定心有不服。認(rèn)為警察只有拿槍才能保護(hù)自己，才能阻止犯罪。其實(shí)事實(shí)并非如此。一些非殺傷性武器在執(zhí)法過(guò)程中也完全可以起到關(guān)鍵的作用。反而，這些非殺傷性武器的使用，不會(huì)過(guò)度刺激犯罪分子。被警槍指著，很多犯罪分子就會(huì)想到以死相博。

但是，面對(duì)警察的電擊槍，伸縮棍，抓捕網(wǎng)等警具，很多犯罪分子可能也會(huì)更加珍愛(ài)自己的生命。所以，只要槍支在社會(huì)中頻繁出現(xiàn)，公眾的安全就會(huì)受到威脅，無(wú)論槍在誰(shuí)的手里。

以上，就是本文的全部?jī)?nèi)容分享，希望能給同學(xué)們帶來(lái)參考，如果您還有【陸哲說(shuō)】雅思寫作：警察帶槍執(zhí)法是否會(huì)導(dǎo)致更高水平的暴力其他方面的疑問(wèn)，歡迎隨時(shí)在線咨詢客服老師。

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fèi)測(cè)試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)不再困難<<